phelsuma madagascariensis grandis, phelsumen, genus, reptilia, gecko, gekko, gekkonidae, gekkota, reptiles, biology, ecology, biogeography, evolution, species dispersal, adaptive radiation, rodrigues, aldabra, captive care, laticauda, vitamines, green, day gecko, lighting, palm, breviceps, modesta primary forest ampasindava madagascar masoala, mangabe, nosy be, national park RNI lokobe, ankarafatsika,phelsuma, phelsuma laticauda, madagascar, daygeckos, daygecko, mauritius, seychelles, mascarenes, reunion, réunion, comoro, comoros, lineata, cepediana, phelsuma guimbeaui, phelsuma andamanensis, phelsuma abbotti, laticauda, madagascariensis, phelsuma lineata, serraticauda, guimbeaui, phelsuma laticauda, phelsuma madagascar, daygecko, daggekko, taggecko

HomeBiogeographySystematicsCaptive CareBibliographyArticlesGalleryGuestbook

EcologyConservationBiodiversityOther FaunaFloraGallery

 

Phelsuma antanosy in danger through habitat destruction.

  Back

By Marc Cadotte

A Canadian mining corporation, QIT-Fer et Titane, Inc., will be sponsoring a large-scale mining project in the extreme south eastern region of Madagascar. The project will result in the removal of much of the remaining coastal littoral rain forest.

The QIT-Fer mining project will be centred around the city of Fort Dauphin (or Tolagnaro) in the extreme south eastern coast of the Island (Fig 1). This region is significant as much of the habitat diversity that Madagascar is famous for, is concentrated in this region (Goodman 1999). During a 50 km drive along Route Nationale 12, one can see coastal marine areas, coastal littoral forest, montane rain forest, dry deciduous forest, and the unique spiny desert.

QIT-Fer will be mining for ilmenite (or titanium dioxide), used primarily in the production of paints, paper, and plastics. This project may involve the removal of 2540 Ha of littoral forest, or 73% of the remaining south eastern coastal forest, leaving only about 940 ha of highly fragmented and isolated forest patches along a 100 km stretch of coast. The clearing of the forest on the proposed mining project will undoubtedly have some profound consequences. Using the species-area relationship, S = cAz (MacArthur and Wilson 1967) we can predict that a 73% decrease in natural forest could entail up to 30% of species becoming locally extinct. Most affected will be the highly localised endemics, which could vanish forever. For example, in the mining region at least 18 species of tree and shrub are found nowhere else on the island (Dumetz 1999), and one Gecko species (Phelsuma antanosy) lives primarily in the to-be-cleared forests of the southeast (Nussbaum et al. 1999).

It is unavoidable that biodiversity will be lost at many levels, from genetic variation of populations to specific communities that form the littoral forest ecosystem. As a result of further fragmentation will, through metapopulation level effects, increase the probability that local populations will go extinct (decreased patch size) while the probability of immigration saving an imperilled local population will decrease (increased isolation) (Wilcox and Murphy 1985; Gilpin and Hanski 1991). Increased fragmentation will also increase the perimeter-to-area ratio, which is synonymous with the injurious "edge effects". Increasing the edge effects by increasing fragmentation can result in increased tree mortality and reduced biomass within 100m from the edge (Laurance et al. 1998), increased intrusion by exotic species, predators, or parasites (e.g., Wilcove et al. 1986), as well as increased wind penetration and temperature, and decreased humidity (Biorregaard et al. 1998). Once fragments fall below 100-400 ha in size, these effects can be greatly exacerbated (Laurance et al. 1998).

These are the consequences of straight out habitat destruction, but there have been indications put forth by QIT-Fer that they will undertake a restoration programme after the mining project. Much of the land cleared in Madagascar has been severely denuded as to preclude any chance of successful restoration projects (Terborgh and Van Shik 1997). Fig. 2 shows cleared land in the region of St. Luce to be included in the proposed conservation area; exposed white sand indicates that no top soil remains and only a few hardy species thrive in this environment (especially Philippia sp., Ericaceae). Impediments to restoration of complex tropical ecosystems include: many intricate evolved mutualisms between all types of organisms, long intervals of time required for many tropical trees to recover, and invasive species commonly acquire a foothold in disturbed habitats. Similarly, many tropical forests represent communities which may be impossible to put back together, despite all our knowledge and efforts (Pimm 1994). Another caveat to the issue of restoration is the cost, Vianne et al. (1997) found that the cost to restore a degraded 9.5 ha patch of rain forest in Brazil was $2,718.50 (U.S.), and this price only included planting, enrichment and vine control. However, the calculation of this cost did not include fire suppression, nor control of resource extraction or hunting. This value translated into the hundreds or thousands of hectares to be restored, equates to a large financial commitment by a private interest.

Bibliography

Bierregaard, R. O. Jr., Lovejoy, T. E., Kapos, V., dos Santos, A. A., and Hutchings, R. W. 1992. The biological dynamics of tropical rainforest fragments. BioScience 42: 859-866.

Cincotta, R. P., Wisnewski, J., and Engelman, R. 2000. Human population in the biodiversity hotspots. Nature 404: 990-992.

Dumetz, N. 1999. High plant diversity of lowland rainforest vestiges in eastern Madagascar. Biodiversity and Conservation 8: 273-315.

Ehrlich, P. R. and Wilson, E. O. 1991. Biodiversity studies: science and policy. Science 253: 758-762.

Gadgil, M. 1995. Prudence and profligacy: a human ecological perspective. In, T. M. Swanson (ed.), The Economics and Ecology of Biodiversity Decline: The Forces Driving Global Change, pp. 99-110. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Gilpin, M. and Hanski, I. (eds.) 1991. Metapopulation Dynamics: Empirical and Theoretical Investigations. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 42 (1 & 2).

Goodman, S. M. 1999. Description of the Reserve Naturelle Integrale d'Andohahela, Madagascar, and the 1995 biological inventory of the reserve. Fieldiana 94: 1-9.

Green, G. M. and Sussman, R. W. 1990. Deforestation history of the eastern rain forests of Madagascar from satellite images. Science 248: 212-215.

Janzen, D. H. 2000. Costa Rica's Area de Conservacion Guanacaste: a long march to survival through non-damaging biodevelopment. Biodiversity 1: 7-20.

Jernvall, J. and Wright, P. C. 1998. Diversity components of impending primate extinctions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 95: 11279-11283.

Kremen, , C., Niles, J. O., Dalton, M. G., Daily, G. C., Ehrlich, P. R., Fay, J. P., Grewal, D., and Guillery, R. P. 2000. Economic incentives for rain forest conservation across scales. Science 288: 1828-1832.

Laurance, W. F. 1999. Reflections on the tropical deforestation crisis. Biological Conservation 91: 109-117.

Laurance, W. F., Ferreira, L. V., Rankin-de Merona, J. M., and Laurance, S. G. 1998. Rain forest fragmentation and the dynamics of Amazonian tree communities. Ecology 79: 2032-2040.

MacArthur, R. H. and Wilson, E. O. 1967. The Theory of Island Biogeography. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.

May, R. M. 1994. Past efforts and future prospects towards understanding how many species there are. In, O. T. Solbrig, H. M. vanEmden, and P. G. W. J. van Oordt, Biodiversity and Global Change, pp. 71-84. CAB International, Paris.

Mittermeier, R. A., Myers, N., Thomsen, J. B., da Fonseca, G. A. B., and Olivieri, S. 1998. Biodiversity hotspots and major tropical wilderness areas: approaches to setting conservation priorities. Conservation Biology 12: 516-520.

Myers, N. 1995. Tropical deforestation: population, poverty and biodiversity. In, T. M. Swanson (ed). The economics and ecology of biodiversity decline: the forces driving global change. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. pp. 111-122.

Myers, N., Mittermeier, R. A., Mittermeier, C. G., da Fonseca, G. A. B., and Kent, J. 2000. Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403: 853-858.

Nussbaum, R. A., Raxworthy, C. J., Raselimanana, A. P., and Ramanamanjato, J. B. 1999. Amphibians and reptiles of the reserve naturelle integrale d'Andohahela, Madagascar. Fieldiana 94: 155-173.

Pimm, S. L. 1994. Biodiversity and the balance of nature. In, E. D. Schulze and H. A. Mooney (eds.), Biodiversity and Ecosystem Function, pp. 347-359. Springer-Verlag, New York.

Pimm, S. L., Russell, G. J., Gittleman, J. L., and Brooks, T. M. 1995. The future of biodiversity. Science 269: 347-350.

Prance, G. T. 1997. Valuation and sustainable use of tropical rainforest. Journal of Biological Education. 31: 258-262.

Prance, G. T., Beentje, H., Dransfield, J., and Johns, R. 2000. The tropical flora remains undercollected. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Gardens 87: 67-71.

Sierra, R. 1999. Traditional resources-use systems and tropical deforestation in a multiethnic region in north-west Ecuador. Environmental Conservation 26: 136-145.

Terborgh, J. and van Schaik, C. P. 1997. Minimizing species loss: the imperative of protection. In, R. Kramer, C. van Schaik, and J. Johnson (eds.), Last Stand: Protected Areas and the Defense of Tropical Biodiversity, pp. 15-35. Oxford University Press, New York.

Tilman, D. 2000. Overview: causes, consequences and ethics of biodiversity. Nature 405: 208-211.

Viana, V. M., Tabanez, A. A. J., and Batista, J. L. F. 1997. Dynamics and restoration of forest fragments in the Brazilian Atlantic moist forest. In, W. F. Laurance and R. O. Bierregaard, Jr. (eds): Tropical forest remnants: ecology, management, and conservation of fragmented communities. Chicago, University of Chicago Press. pp 351-365.

Wallace, A. R. 1892. Island Life: Or The Phenomena and Causes of Insular Faunas and Floras Including a Revision and Attempted Solution of the Problem of Geological Climates. Macmillan and Co., London.

Wilcove, D. S., McLellan, C. H., and Dobson, A. P. 1986. Habitat fragmentation in the temperate zone. In, M. E. Soule (ed.), Conservation Biology: The Science of Scarcity and Diversity, pp. 237-256. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland MA.

Wilcox, B. A. and Murphy, D. D. 1985. Conservation strategy: the effects of fragmentation on extinction. American Naturalist 125: 879-887.

Wilson, E. O. 1992. The Diversity of Life. W. W. Norton and Company, New York.

Whitemore, T. C. 1997. Tropical forest disturbance, disappearance, and species loss. In, W. F. Laurance and R. O. Bierregaard, Jr. (eds): Tropical forest remnants: ecology, management, and conservation of fragmented communities. Chicago, University of Chicago Press. pp 3-12.

 

 

 

© Copyright 1991-2004 Phelsumania - Emmanuel Van Heygen